ISO 27001/BS 25999 documents, presentation decks and implementation guidelines


Free_Downloads
 

Free eBook

Free eBook 9 Steps to Cybersecurity
 
Newsletter
 
Sign up for our free Newsletter and as bonus you'll receive my tips on how to launch an information security and business continuity project.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    

UPCOMING FREE WEBINAR

    

 
The basics of risk assessment and treatment according to ISO 27001

    

Wednesday
July 3, 2013

    Register_now_green
    
 
 
 

Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) – where does he belong in an org chart?

'By 'Dejan Kosutic on September 11, 2012

Companies that start implementing an information security program, or specifically ISO 27001, very soon realize that they cannot do it without a person who would coordinate and manage such activities. But then they face the following dilemmas:  Who should this person be responsible to? In which department should this person work? How to avoid conflict of interest?

Avoiding conflict of interest

One of the most important things in information security is to avoid conflict of interest, that is, to separate the operations from control and audit. Therefore, the same person cannot be both CISO and internal auditor. Similarly, the information security manager should not work in the IT department, although since this is very difficult to achieve in smaller organizations it is usually tolerated; however, for larger organizations such conflict of interest is not allowed, and some industries are heavily regulated in this respect.

Options for placing CISO in an organization

It doesn’t really matter if you call this person Chief Information Security Officer, information security manager, information security coordinator, or something similar – basically, there are three options for placing such person within an organization:

a) A separate function directly responsible to the CEO – this is the best option, but at the same time the most expensive. It means you have a person who is dedicated full-time to information security, a professional with lots of experience in this field. This is usually the case in larger companies.

b) A position within a department with no conflict of interest – this is the situation very often seen in companies like financial institutions, where the information security manager is placed within the Operational Risk department. This means you have a person that is dedicated full-time or part-time to information security, and is a part of a team dedicated to risk mitigation. Since this person doesn’t report directly to the CEO, you don’t need to have a top professional for such a position.

c) Information security as an additional role – this is a situation typical for smaller companies – for example, the IT manager is at the same time the information security coordinator. As mentioned before, it is very difficult to avoid conflict of interest in such organizations, but this is certainly the cheapest solution and often the only feasible one for smaller organizations which start ISO 27001 implementation.

As the company develops its information security management system, certainly the position and responsibilities of Chief Information Security Officer will have to change. But much more important than the formal position of this person, is to enable him or her to be in constant contact with both the business and IT sides of the organization, and to have enough authority to implement necessary changes.


  • Giampaolo

    Hi Dejan, I agree with you and in my opinion Security organization and roles and responsibilities is the starting point of Security in a company…without this nothing will function as it should . The position of CISO depends from many factors and it can be under CFO, or HR, or Auditing, or Legal…but i think that depending from CEO ( or have a position in a Security department that depends from CEO) is the best. Another point is the definition of the responsibilities of CISO and this could depend from the company and how the Security is organized ( for example centralized model or distributed model) so is possible that also the operation is in the hands of CISO or there could be an IT Security Manager that is responible for the operation that functionally reports to CISO. It is also important that the business manager are involved in security ( and this must be written in their responsibilities) expecially in evaluating the value of their assets using the methodologies provided by the CISO, as well as the Audit department should have specific statements to periodically check, policies, procedures, level of countermeasures, behaviours, and standards and law compliance that is responsibility of CISO.

  • http://blog.iso27001standard.com/ Dejan Kosutic

    Thank you for your comment, Giampaolo – I agree with you. The only thing I don’t agree with is that CISO can be placed under Auditing organizational unit – that would be conflict of interest, therefore such situation should be avoided.

  • Bill

    As a CSO, I have reported to CIO and CFO. My thoughts are that the CIO is about producing a return with information technology for the corporation. The CIO will usually look to reduce cost and increase profit. As mentioned, the CFO maybe a solution. I reported into the CFO since he had the risk function. It worked much better than reporting to the CIO where I always was over ruled. Technologist are not good at risk.

    As a management consultant in privacy and security, I always recommend that an organization have a CSO and CPO. They can reduce cost by having the positions combined. Smaller companies may want to hire a CSO for hire part time or through a consulting agreement.

  • http://blog.iso27001standard.com/ Dejan Kosutic

    Excellent points – thanks, Bill!